Medical education is keeping pace with emerging technology. Here’s four ways using virtual patients enhances what we learn.
1. Applications of Virtual Patients to Medical Education – Medical students begin their studies with an educational goal before they even attend their first lecture. But, because of the volume of information and variation in patient cases during rotations medical students might not practice most common scenarios during rotations often enough for knowledge retention. The disadvantage of static learning (books) is that students lack the interactive simulation of clinical scenarios necessary for effective medical training. Real-world experiences go a long way toward helping students grasp necessary medical concepts. Virtual learning requires students to make decisions and predict outcomes based on virtual scenarios via an effective e-learning software application.
2. Group Sessions with Virtual Patients – To promote clinical reasoning and clinical workplace learning, educators that focus on small group sessions with virtual patients and students along with didactics are able to offer just-in-time learning based on clinical events and decision support technology.
3. Assessment – Procedures in medicine require practice. Virtual patients are ideal for practicing and becoming experts in hands-on procedures such as inserting a chest tube to carotid angiography. Examples of cool web apps and web apps like Google Body – http://bodybrowser.googlelabs.com/ are examples of how e-learning is transforming medial education.
4. Stepwise Retention and Clinical Reasoning – History taking, physical examination, laboratory tests, CXRs, ECGs, and treatment options are simple to retain by practicing on virtual patients because students gain a stepwise method of knowledge application.
What’s your favorite learning technology?
Cook DA, Erwin PJ, Triola MM. Computerized virtual patients in health professions education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Academic Medicine. 2010;85:1589 –1602.
Huwendiek S, De leng BA, Zary N, Fischer MR, Ruiz JG, Ellaway R. Towards a typology of virtual patients. Med Teach. 2009;31:743–748.
MedBiquitous Web site. http://www.medbiq.org/std_specs/standards/index.html.
eViP: Electronic Virtual Patients Web site.http://www.virtualpatients.eu.
Berman N, Fall LH, Smith S, Levine DA, Maloney CG, Potts M, Siegel B, Foster-Johnson L. Integration strategies for using virtual patients in clinical clerkships. Acad Med 2009;84:942-9.
Huang G, Reynolds R, Candler C. Virtual patient simulation at US and Canadian medical schools. Acad Med 2007;82:446-51.
Ellaway R, Poulton T, Fors U, McGee JB, Albright S. Building a virtual patient commons. Med Teacher 2008; 30:170-4.
Triola M, Feldman H, Kalet AL, Zabar S, Kachur EK, Gillespie C, Anderson M, Griesser C, Lipkin M. A randomized trial of teaching clinical skills using virtual and live standardized patients. J Gen Intern Med 2006;21:424-9.
Sijstermans R, Jaspers MWM., Bloemendaal PM, Schoonderwaldt EM. Training inter-physician communication using the dynamic patient simulator. Int J Med Inform 2007;76:336-43.
Posel N, Fleiszer D, Shore BM. 12 Tips: Guidelines for authoring virtual patient cases. Med Teacher 2009;31:701-8.
Deladisma AM, Cohen M, Stevens A, Wagner P, Lok B, Bernard T, Oxendine C, Schumacher L, Johnsen K, Dickerson R, Raij A, Wells R, Duerson M, Harper JG, Lind DS. Do medical students respond empathetically to a virtual patient? Am J Surg 2007; 193:756-60.
Bearman M, Cesnik B, Liddell M. Random comparison of “virtual patient” models in the context of teaching clinical communication skills. Med Educ 2001;35:824-32.
Huwendiek S, Reichert F, Bosse HM, De Leng BA, Van der Vleuten CPM, Haag M, Hoffmann GF, Tönshoff B. Design principles for virtual patients. Med Educ. 2009 Jun;43(6):580-8